Analysis of regression relationships of air temperature at different altitudes in the mountains of the Northern Urals

N.V. Tantsyrev, N.S. Ivanova*, I.V. Petrova
DOI 10.31242/2618-9712-2022-27-2-258-267

Show more

Institute Botanic Garden UB RAS, Yekaterinburg, Russia
*[email protected]

Submitted 18.01.2022
Revised 14.03.2022
Accepted 29.03.2022

For citation
Tantsyrev N.V., Ivanova N.S., Petrova I.V. Analysis of regression relationships of air temperature at different altitudes in the mountains of the Northern Urals // Arctic and Subarctic Natural Resources. 2022, Vol. 27, No. 2. P. 258–267. (In Russ.)

Abstract. We investigate the temperature factors, which limit the spread and survival of plants in high mountain conditions of the Northern Urals. We aim to establish regression relationships of temperature data of four altitudinal belts in the southern part of the Northern Urals (59º30′ N, 59°15′ E) with the control data received from the Karpinsk meteorological station (Sverdlovsk region 59°46′ N, 60°00′ E). The air temperatures were recorded continuously day and night, every two hours, at a height of 1.5–2 m above the soil surface from May to October 2019 at four elevation locations: 460 m a.s.l. (in the mountain forest belt, under the canopy of Siberian stone pine stands); 640 m a.s.l. (in the mountain forest belt, under the canopy of Siberian stone pine stands); 820 m a.s.l. (in the belt of sub-alpine woodlands with elements of mountain forest-tundra);1030 m a.s.l. (on a plateau in the mountain tundra). We have established that the change in the air temperature at different elevation levels and at the meteorological station occurred relatively synchronously. The difference in average daily temperatures between the control data from the meteorological station and elevation points at 460, 640, 820 and 1030 m a.s.l. was 2.2, 3.0, 4.7 and 5.1 °С, respectively. We have established a reliable close rectilinear connection of the average daily air temperatures obtained from the station and all four elevation points. The coefficient of determination (R2) for elevation levels at 460, 640, 820 and 1030 m a.s.l. was 0.96, 0.95, 0.92 and 0.88, respectively. The relationships between the maximum and minimum temperatures, depending on the elevation level, with the control data from the meteorological station were also quite high (R2 does not fall below 0.83 for maximum and 0.7 for minimum). Identified relationships and obtained regression equations allow to reconstruct, retrospectively, the dynamics of the thermal regime based on the data from the Karpinsk meteorological station for mountainous habitats of different elevation levels in the southern part of the Northern Urals over a long-term period. The results also imply the possibility of reconstruction of extreme temperatures, which act as factors limiting dispersal and survival of plants, and determine the biodiversity of ecosystems.

Keywords: Northern Urals, mountain ecosystems, altitude zones, air temperature

Acknowledgements. The work was carried out within the state assignment of the Institute Botanic Garden Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences.


  1. Pătru-Stupariu I., Hossu C.A, Grădinaru S.R., Nita A., Stupariu M.-S., Huzui-Stoiculescu A., Gavrilidis A.-A. A Review of Changes in Mountain Land Use and Ecosystem Services: From Theory to Practice // Land. 2020. Vol. 9(9). P. 336.
  2. Gao J., Tang X., Lin S., Bian H. The influence of land use change on key ecosystem services and their relationships in a mountain region from past to future (1995–2050) // Forests. 2021. Vol. 12(5). P. 616. https://
  3. Kohler T., Maselli D. Mountains and Climate Change – From Understanding to Action. Published by Geographica Bernensia with the support of the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), and an international team of contributors. Bern, 2009. 78 p.
  4. Ivanova N.S. Lesotipologicheskie osobennosti bioraznoobrazie i vosstanovitel’no-vozrastnoy dinamiki rastitel’nosti gornych lesov Yuzhnogo i Srednego Urala. Diss. … dokt. biol. nauk. [Forest typological features of biodiversity and restoration-age dynamics of vegetation of mountain forests of the Southern and Middle Urals. Dr. boil. sc. diss.] Yekaterinburg, 2019. 304 p.
  5. Jandl R., Kindermann G., Foldal C., Schüler S., Bouissou C. Early Performance of Tree Species in a Mountain Reforestation Experiment // Forests. 2021. Vol. 12(2). P. 256.
  6. Mengist W., Soromessa T., Legese G. Ecosystem services research in mountainous regions: A systematic literature review on current knowledge and research gaps // Science of The Total Environment. 2020. Vol. 702. P. 134581.
  7. Fomin V., Ivanova N., Mikhailovich A. Genetic forest typology as a scientific and methodological basis for environmental studies and forest management // IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2020. Vol. 609. 012044.
  8. Fomin V., Ivanova N., Mikhailovich A., Zolotova E. Problem of climate-driven dynamics in the genetic forest typology // Modern synthetic methodologies for creating drugs and functional materials (mosm2020): AIP Conference Proceedings. 2021. Vol. 2388. 030007. https://doi. org/10.1063/5.0068806
  9. Maiti R., Rodriguez H.G., Ivanova N.S. Autoecology and Ecophysiology of Woody Shrubs and Trees: Concepts and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, 2016. 352 p. 10.1002/9781119104452
  10. Shirk A.J., Cushman S.A., Waring K.M., Wehenkel C.A., Leal-Sáenz A., Toney C., Lopez-Sanchez C.A. Southwestern white pine (Pinus strobiformis) species distribution models project a large range shift and contraction due to regional climatic changes // Forest Ecology and Management. 2018. Vol. 411. P. 176–186. https://
  11. Ivanova N.S., Zolotova E.S. Adaptation of forest ecosystems to the humidity factor in the Middle Urals // Uchenye zapiski kazanskogo universiteta Seriya estestvennye nauki. 2019. Vol. 161, No. 2. P. 293–306. https:// 10.26907/2542-064X.2019.2.293-306
  12. Ivanova N.S., Zolotova E.S., Li G. Influence of soil moisture regime on the species biomass of the herb layer of pine forests in the Ural Mountains // Ecological Questions. 2021. Vol. 32, No. 2. EQ.2021.011
  13. Kellomäki S. Managing Boreal Forests in the Context of Climate Change: Impacts, Adaptation and Climate Change Mitigation. CRC Press, 2016. 365 p.
  14. Ivanova N., Fomin V., Kusbach A. Experience of forest ecological classification in assessment of vegetation dynamics // Sustainability. 2022. Vol. 14, No. 6. P. 3384.
  15. Shiyatov S.G., Mazepa V.S. Contemporary expansion of Siberian larch into the mountain tundra of the Polar Urals // Russian Journal of Ecology. 2015. Vol. 46, No. 6. P. 495–502. 16 Sannikov S.N. Tantsyrev N.V., Petrova I.V. Invasion of Siberian Pine Populations in Mountain Tundra in the Northern Urals // Contemporary Problems of Ecology. 2018. Vol. 11, No 4. P. 396–405.
  16. Shiyatov S.G. Dendrokhronologiya verkhney granitsy lesa na Urale. Moskva: Nauka, 1986. 136 p.
  17. Hagedorn F., Rigling A., Shiyatov S.G., Mazepa V.S., Devi N.M., Grigor’ev A.A., Terent’ev M., Moiseev P.A., Bartysh A.A., Fomin V.V., Kapralov D.S., Bugman H. Treeline advances along the Urals Mountain range – driven by improved winter conditions? // Global Change Biology. 2014. Vol. 20, No. 11. P. 3530–3543.
  18. Hagedorn F., Dawes M.A., Bubnov M.O., Devi N.M., Grigoriev A.A., Mazepa V.S., Shiyatov S.G., Moiseev P.A., Nagimov Z.Y. Latitudinal decline in stand biomass and productivity at the elevational treeline in the Ural Mountains despite a common thermal growth limit // Journal of Biogeography. 2020. Vol. 47, No. 8. P. 1827–1842.
  19. Körner C. Alpine plant life. Functional plant ecology and high mountain ecosystems. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1999. 238 p.
  20. Kolesnikov B.P., Zubareva R.S., Smolonogov Ye.P. Lesorastitel’nyye usloviya i tipy lesov Sverdlovskoy oblasti. Prakticheskoye rukovodstvo. Sverdlovsk: UNTS AN SSSR, 1973. 176 p.
  21. Gorchakovskiy P.L. Rastitel’nyy mir vysokogornogo Urala. M.: Nauka, 1975. 281 p.